Post a reply
Username:
Note:If not registered, provide any username. For more comfort, register here.
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Confirmation of post
To prevent automated posts the board requires you to enter a confirmation code. The code is displayed in the image you should see below. If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the %sBoard Administrator%s.
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
   

Topic review - modality of singularities
Author Message
  Post subject:  thanks!  Reply with quote
:D
Post Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:25 am
  Post subject:  bug fix  Reply with quote
get a new version of the library hnoether.lib
from
ftp://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/pub/Math ... oether.lib
This should solve this issue.

Hans Schoenemann
Post Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:00 pm
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
Indeed, this is a bug. :(
It will (hopefully) be fixed in the next version of SINGULAR.
So far tau_es works only correct in the Newton nondegenerate case.
Post Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:00 am
  Post subject:  Something is strange with \tau^{es} !!  Reply with quote
The command
poly f = (x2+y2)*(y2-(x-y)^3)*(x^3+y9);
tau_es(f);

returns: tau_es(f)=37

while the command
poly f = ((x+y)^2+y2)*(y2-x3)*((x+y)^3+y9);
tau_es(f);

returns: tau_es(f)=23

note, however, that the polynomials differ by just a linear change of variables x->x+y


A bug in Singular?
Post Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:23 am
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
Thanks!
Post Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:58 am
  Post subject:   Reply with quote
Computing the modality is a non-trivial task and there is no general algorithm available besides the classification, except for plane curve singularities. Moreover, we have to distinguish the modality for right- and contact-equivalence (the latter is even more complicated than the first).

For curve singularities we can compute the right-modality with the help of an embedded resolution, cf.
G.-M. Greuel, C. Lossen, E. Shustin: Introduction to Singularities and Deformations. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (2006), p. 373, Remarks and Exercises.
Or by the algorithm developed in
A. Campillo, G.-M. Greuel, C. Lossen: Equisingular Calculations for Plane Curve Singularities. J. Symb. Comput. 42 (2007), 89-114.
The latter is implemented in Singular in equising.lib.

If mod denotes the right modality of an isolated hypersurface singularity f then mod = dimension of the mu-constant stratum of f in the base of the semiuniversal deformation of f, where mu is the Milnor number of f.
Hence, if f is semi-quasihomogeneous or Newton-nondegenerate, it can be computed with the help of the Newton diagram of f.

A discussion of this with examples about how to use the SINGULAR library equising.lib to compute the modality or, equivalently, the codimension tau_es of the mu-constant stratum for arbitrary plane curve singularities can be found at the above mentioned place too.

Example:
LIB "equising.lib";
ring r = 0,(x,y),ds;
poly f = x5+y6;
milnor(f) - tau_es(f);

// -> 3 i.e. the right-modality is 3
(printlevel = 1; shows additional information)
[/quote]
Post Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:59 pm
  Post subject:  modality of singularities  Reply with quote
I haven't found a command to calculate the modality of a singular point.
In some simple cases this can be done by running classify(f);

Guess this works for some lowest cases only.
But it does not recognize (??) e.g. the case (x^5+y^6)
Post Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:20 pm


It is currently Fri May 13, 2022 10:59 am
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group