Post a reply
Username:
Note:If not registered, provide any username. For more comfort, register here.
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Confirmation of post
To prevent automated posts the board requires you to enter a confirmation code. The code is displayed in the image you should see below. If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the %sBoard Administrator%s.
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
   

Topic review - maybe a bug? reduced minimal groebner basis is not right
Author Message
  Post subject:  Re: maybe a bug? reduced minimal groebner basis is not right  Reply with quote
Dear gepo,
we call G a reduced Gröbner basis, if no term from tail(g) for any g ∈ G is divisible by a leading term of an element of G.
Note also, that you cannot have normalized Gröbner bases in every case. For instance, the ideal <2*x> over Z cannot be simplified into <x>, because Z has no multiplicative inverse for non-units.

For a brief description of Gröbner Bases over rings chapter 2 of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2008.11.043

Best regards,
Alexander
Post Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:34 am
  Post subject:  Re: maybe a bug? reduced minimal groebner basis is not right  Reply with quote
Dear Alexander,
Could you tell a little bit more about what the conditions are for a minimal reduced Groebner Basis over ring?

I am not quite clear about that.

Thanks a lot.
Post Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:21 am
  Post subject:  Re: maybe a bug? reduced minimal groebner basis is not right  Reply with quote
Dear gepo,
this does only apply to Gröbner bases of polynomials whose coefficient domain is a field.
In your example, Z/8 (this is not the Galois field with 8 elements) is used, which is a proper ring (no field).

Regards,
Alexander
Post Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:53 pm
  Post subject:  maybe a bug? reduced minimal groebner basis is not right  Reply with quote
Hi, all,

I found an tricky problem:
> ring r=(integer, 2, 3), (a,b,c,d,e,f,s),dp;
> ideal i=f-a*b-a*c,e-a*d,d-b-c,s*(f-e)-4;
> option(redSB);
> std(i);
_[1]=4
_[2]=e-f
_[3]=b+c-d
_[4]=ad-f

Have a look at the result, it is not a reduced minimal Groebner Basis!
Because according to the definition of minimal Groebner Basis, all the coefficients of generators in GB should be 1.
Here _[1]=4 which is not 1.

Any comments?

Thanks
Post Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:25 pm


It is currently Fri May 13, 2022 11:03 am
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group