Back to Forum | View unanswered posts | View active topics





Post a reply
Username:
Note:If not registered, provide any username. For more comfort, register here.
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Confirmation of post
To prevent automated posts the board requires you to enter a confirmation code. The code is displayed in the image you should see below. If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the %sBoard Administrator%s.
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
   

Topic review - SSI format versioning between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2
Author Message
hannes
  Post subject:  Re: SSI format versioning between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2  Reply with quote
The basic data representations (int, string, number, poly, ideal, etc.)
are the same. But calls to kernel commands differ:
there are 2 new (http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/4- ... tm#SEC2400) .
First line:
98 <ssi-version> <max. token> <current options, part 1> <current options, part 2>

Summary: as long as no "quote" is used, the format is the same.
Post Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:13 am
Guest
  Post subject:  SSI format versioning between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2  Reply with quote
Hello,
Wondering if someone could point me towards documentation for changes to the SSI format.

When reading in an SSI file created in 4.0.2 into 4.0.1 I get the error
Code:
incompatible versions of ssi: 8/526 vs 8/528
When I write this file back out and compare the two files, they differ only by the first line:
Code:
1c1
< 98 8 528 100663424 10321
---
> 98 8 526 100663424 10321
I guess there is no significant difference between SSI format versions (?) 8/528 for Singular 4.0.2 and 8/526 for Singular 4.0.1 but I'd appreciate some help confirming this, or at least interpreting this first line of the file. Regards,
Eric
Post Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 4:59 am


It is currently Fri May 13, 2022 11:04 am
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group