Post a reply
Username:
Note:If not registered, provide any username. For more comfort, register here.
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Confirmation of post
To prevent automated posts the board requires you to enter a confirmation code. The code is displayed in the image you should see below. If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the %sBoard Administrator%s.
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
   

Topic review - Cramers Rule and Syzygies
Author Message
  Post subject:  Cramers Rule and Syzygies  Reply with quote
Hello,

A question related not directly with Singular, but with algebraic geometry:
The geometric interpretation of a syzygy module is that it forms the tangent bundle of the algebraic set of the corresponding ideal, respectively module.
When now one of the elements m_i from the basis of the module is multiplied with a polynomial f, it is still in the module, however the module generated by the new generating set is smaller. I was wondering what the geometric interpretation of this is, e.g. does the new module describe the tangent space of the ideal everywhere where f=!=0?
This problem occured when I was trying to solve a huge polynomial equation and took the quick and dirty path of using Cramers rule, which gives a solution which is complete in the sense of algebra, but not in the sense of algebraic geometry, so I was wondering what these solutions describe geometrically.

Best regards and Thanks in advance!
Post Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:22 pm


It is currently Fri May 13, 2022 10:54 am
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group