Back to Forum | View unanswered posts | View active topics





Post a reply
Username:
Note:If not registered, provide any username. For more comfort, register here.
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
Font size:
Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Confirmation of post
To prevent automated posts the board requires you to enter a confirmation code. The code is displayed in the image you should see below. If you are visually impaired or cannot otherwise read this code please contact the %sBoard Administrator%s.
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
   

Topic review - difference between using std and std together with the redSB
Author Message
gorzel
  Post subject:  Re: difference between using std and std together with the redSB  Reply with quote
You could search this forum for 'redSB'.

This shows some examples, notably:

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1336&hilit=redSB

and

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1908&hilit=redSB

Quote:
Or is the redSB-Option automatically part of std?


The calculation of the reduced Groebner basis,
in case that option(redSB); is set,
is a postprocessing step after the computation of the std-basis.
One can notice this when option(prot); is enabled.
Post Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:37 pm
mk
  Post subject:  difference between using std and std together with the redSB  Reply with quote
Hello,

has anyone an example for a difference between using std and std together with the redSB-Option?
Or is the redSB-Option automatically part of std?

Many thanks,
MK
Post Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 7:56 pm


It is currently Fri May 13, 2022 11:04 am
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group