In this example, we have two winners, strategy NONE and ll-SsRr with 161/173 and syl-l-RSrs with 131/233 (maximal/total number of cosets defined) depending on which of the two values is considered more important. The orderings kbo-R and kbo-r with 158/211 and kbo-S and kbo-s with 153/207 lie between those two and might be preferred. All other strategies perform slightly (factor 1.5) or considerably (factor 10) worse.